On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:21:14AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:44:20PM +0300, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:23:12AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > this is also in RELENG_7 but i am not sure whether this workaround > > > has any drawback e.g., when curr_time passes a 32-bit boundary > > > there seems to be an incorrect setting of q->numbytes > > > > Workaround is fine in average. It may fail for: > > 1) _very_ idle flow (more than 2^32 ticks) while calculating q->avg > > 2) any flow once per 2^32 ticks > > then q_time will be updated and things will be ok again. > > understand - my question is whether there is strong objection > in applying the real fix (the one in HEAD) rather than this > workaround. > In my opinion the MFC is quite safe as I explained. > > cheers > luigi
I see. I have no objection but i think this is policy question so i'm not the right person to ask. -- Oleg. ================================================================ === Oleg Bulyzhin -- OBUL-RIPN -- OBUL-RIPE -- o...@rinet.ru === ================================================================ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
