On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:19:10AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyu...@gmail.com> wrote > about Re: fun with if_re: > > PY> > I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will > PY> > start using them today. However, as it has worked without problems > PY> > for weeks with the buggy version before, I will not be able to say > PY> > if it is really working until next month or so. Or do you know any > PY> > method to reliably > PY> > PY> That's fine. > > > I had to reboot some of the machines meanwhile and could do some further > testing. One strange thing I noticed is that the re-interfaces often do > not come up in a working state after rebooting. Strangely, I see > network traffic floating around via tcpdump, but not even ping works. > This state often goes away when playing around with the interface > (sometimes ifconfig down/up helps, sometimes disabling some of the > additional features like txc/rxc), but I cannot make out a reproducible > behaviour so far. When the interface leaves this strange state it seems to > work fine afterwards. Any clues? >
Does this happen on latest if_re.c/if_rlreg.h? I guess jkim fixed this type of problem in r187483. If that have no effect please let me know. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"