Byung-Hee HWANG <b...@izb.knu.ac.kr> writes: > Giorgos Keramidas <keram...@freebsd.org> writes: > >> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:42:26 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG <b...@izb.knu.ac.kr> >> wrote: >>> Hello! A few hours ago, Chong Yidong, Emacs maintainer, has been >>> released Emacs 23.1 on gnu.org's mailing lists. Since i use Emacs as >>> default mailer, i really want that FreeBSD Project Release Team to add >>> Emacs 23.1 (Stable Ver.) into FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE. Because i use only >>> -RELEASE branch as far as i possibly can. Then i can use pkg_add >>> instead of ports, so easily. Thanks in advance ..;; >> >> Hi Byung-Hee, >> >> AFAIK, The ports are not frozen yet. I think we can make it by updating >> the port before this weekend. >> >> There is a bit of testing to make sure that we can repo-copy the >> editors/emacs port to editors/emacs22 and check that the new >> editors/emacs port for 23.1 works fine. >> >> I'm working on it, and I will post patches soon-ish :) > > Thanks, Giorgos! Let's fire Emacs gun! > > ... and following is somewhat off topic. FreeBSD Project's SPF rules > marked Giorgos's mail address (keram...@freebsd.org) as > "softfail". That's bad news to me. SPF [RFC4408] is Experimental draft, > you know. Actually Giorgos's mail is very healthy message. Hmm.. i > cannot understand why FreeBSD Project postmaster team adopted such lame > email policy. Please let's go with another policy (e.g., RFC4801). There > is good role model on RFC4801. The Python Project deployed RFC4801 rules > in their own mailing list server, as far as i know. And i heard that is > working very fine ...
Oops, i made mistake. The above RFC4801 should be RFC4871. Sorry ;; -- "Sonny, you in there?" "Yeah, Tom, what is it?" -- Tom Hagen and Santino Corleone, "Chapter 1", page 28 _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"