On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <free...@jdc.parodius.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote: >> Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> > imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you >> > do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and >> > burn some eye of newt. >> >> This is not a rant, but where do you read that on FreeBSD 7.2 ZFS has >> been marked as production ready. >> As far as i know, on FreeBSD 8.0 ZFS is called production ready. >> >> If you boot your system it probably tell you it is still experimental. >> >> Try running FreeBSD 7-Stable to get the latest ZFS version which on >> FreeBSD is 13 >> On 7.2 it is still at 6 (if I remember it right). > > RELENG_7 uses ZFS v13, RELENG_8 uses ZFS v18. >
RELENG_8 is still using ZFS v13. > RELENG_7 and RELENG_8 both, more or less, behave the same way with > regards to ZFS. Both panic on kmem exhaustion. No one has answered my > question as far as what's needed to stabilise ZFS on either 7.x or 8.x. > Under RELENG_8/i386, you still need to tune ZFS as mentioned in the ZFS Tuning Guide: http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide With RELENG_8/amd64 no tuning is necessary, if the system has at least 2G RAM. Scot _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
