On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:55:00AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > I've tried this patch, and it completely breaks IPv6 offloads, which DO work > btw, > our testers have a netperf stress test that does both ipv4 and ipv6, and > that test > fails 100% after this change. > > I could go hacking at it myself but as its your code Pyun would you like to > resolve this issue? >
I wonder how you could test IPv6 checksum offloading/TSO as FreeBSD does not have that capability yet. Do we already have that capability? I vaguely remember there was an effort to bring the support in but I don't know current status. If we have the capability I would have to update all other drivers that can do IPv6 checksum offloading/TSO for IPv6. > Regards, > > Jack > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jack Vogel <jfvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > No, it hasn't, I need time to look it over and be convinced of what he was > > doing. > > > > Jack > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Nick Rogers <ncrog...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> looks like the patch mentioned in kern/141843 has not been applied to the > >> tree? > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Nick Rogers <ncrog...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Is it advisable to patch 8.0-RELEASE kernel sources with the latest > >> > (CURRENT) em driver (i.e., src/sys/dev/e1000)? It looks like there are > >> some > >> > updates to the driver since 8.0-RELEASE that may fix some problems? > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
