On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:25:55AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:07:36PM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: > > > Great work Luigi ;) > > > That's amazing... anyway ?is it production-ready? > > > > i would say it is pretty solid. I used it on my main workstation > > and desktop for a few months last year without a glitch. > > I appreciate your work on this -- truly I do -- but the above statement > is incredible. This is not meant as a flame-inducer, but there's really > no other way to phrase it: > > This IS NOT what "production-ready" means to the rest of us, > particularly those of us in the server world. A single developer > running such code on their workstation for a few months is in no way > identical to that of a heavily I/O-bound server.
exactly - i said "pretty robust" and not "production ready". There are known issues with multiple disks arrangements (gvinum etc.) due to a reuse of a field in a structure. These are solved in 8.x. cheers luigi > > I thought freebsd.org (or maybe ISC?) offered some test/development > boxes on the 'net available to developers who could test such code + > perform stress tests over long periods of time? I'm probably mistaken, > but I was under that impression. > > -- > | Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com | > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
