On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:32:01 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no> wrote:
This output looks ... wrong ... somehow to my eyes: r...@kg-f2# date Sat Feb 20 22:51:24 CET 2010 r...@kg-f2# ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== *kg-omni1.kg4.no 129.240.64.3 3 u 62 64 377 0.244 597.314 360.123 r...@kg-f2# ntpdc -c loopi -c sysi offset: 0.000000 s frequency: 500.000 ppm poll adjust: 4 watchdog timer: 549 s system peer: kg-omni1.kg4.no system peer mode: client leap indicator: 11 stratum: 16 precision: -18 root distance: 0.00000 s root dispersion: 0.00822 s reference ID: [10.1.10.1] reference time: 00000000.00000000 Thu, Feb 7 2036 7:28:16.000 system flags: auth monitor ntp kernel stats jitter: 0.360107 s stability: 0.000 ppm broadcastdelay: 0.003998 s authdelay: 0.000000 s Shouldn't ntpq and ntpdc be in agreement? -- Torfinn _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"