On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:41:02 +0200 Daniel Braniss <da...@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB> check: DB> ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/plot.ps DB> x is seconds, y is mbus current. Looks not as bad as mine. I had 37k when I rebooted the machine some minutes ago (and it's basically idle, just serving a few nfs clients that don't do much). But from the values Jeremy has posted and from my own comparsisons here I would think that something like 5k of mbuf clusters would be normal for my machine (and probably also for yours). Some more info from my side: In the meantime I also tried a different network interface. The nfe-interface that is onboard causes the same problems, so it is probably not an em-specific issue. Furthermore I found this via Google: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-December/014062.html>. I patched and recompiled my kernel with this, just to try it out. Right now I have 2264/1321/3585 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 1239/1017/2256/65000 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 1239/809 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) but the uptime is only 12min so far. In some hours I'll know for certain if this patch has anything to do with the problem. cu Gerrit _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"