On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Maho NAKATA <cha...@mac.com> wrote: > Hi Andry and Adam > > My test again. No desktop, etc. I just run dgemm. > Contrary to Adam's result, Hyper Threading makes the performance worse. > all tests are done on Core i7 920 @ 2.67GHz. (TurboBoost @2.8GHz) > > Turbo Boost off, Hyper threading off: 82% (35GFlops) [1] > Turbo Boost off, Hyper threading off: 72% (30.5GFlops) [2] > > Turbo Boost on, Hyper threading on: 71% (32GFlops) [3] > Turbo Boost off, Hyper threading off: 84-89% (38-40GFlops) [4]
Doesn't this make sense? Hyperthreaded cores in Intel procs still provide an incomplete set of registers as they're logical processors, so I would expect for things to be slower if they're automatically run on the SMT cores instead of the physical ones. Is there a weighting scheme to SCHED_ULE where logical processors (like the SMT variety) get a lower score than real processors do, and thus get scheduled for less intensive interrupting tasks, or maybe just don't get scheduled in high use scenarios like it would if it was a physical processor? Thanks, -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
