On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:05:17AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 4/18/2010 4:24 PM, Andrew Reilly wrote: > > By way of discussion, I'd just like to re-iterate what I > > said the first time around: it must be understood that this > > sort of thing is a (necessary) hacky-workaround that should > > ultimately be unnecessary. > > While I find the discussion about launchd-type facilities interesting, > we have a real problem at the moment and now we have a real solution for it. > > Jeremy, since no one has criticized your idea on a technical basis why > don't you run it by the -net and -rc lists to be sure that it's > technically sound, then I would be inclined to move forward with it.
Doug and Garrett -- thanks. I'll send a shorter mail to said lists referencing the discussion here on -stable and let folks weigh in. Much appreciated! -- | Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
