On 4/11/2011 12:55 PM, Denny Schierz said this: > > Am 11.04.2011 um 16:20 schrieb Michael Loftis: > >> Most switches load balance based on MAC addresses, not IP, unless it >> is routing the traffic as a Layer 3 switch then you can enable IP >> based load balancing in some of those. Also you might simply be > > that was the reason, why we disabled the loadbalancer and tested with plain > NICs. > >> reaching the limits of your firewall box too you haven't mentioned any >> of it's specs, nor do you seem to have run top while running the iperf >> tests. > > The clients (who running iperf -c <ip>) had a load near zero, they are > powerful machines (Sun sparcs) with 8 cores and more. The machine, with 4 > Cores (Xeon) who is running "iperf -s", had a load round about ~0.8. > > No firewall etc. between the hosts, just plain network :-) > > cu denny_______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >
Are you certain you are not somehow running active-passive instead of active-active ... just a thought... -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
