On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:55:43AM +0100, seanr...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Kalchev <dan...@digsys.bg> wrote: > >> If it is a limitation in ZFS it would be nice to know that, perhaps it > >> truly, really is a bug that can be avoided (or it's inherent in the way ZFS > >> handles such things) > > > > It is possible ?that there is not enough memory in ARC to cache that large > > directory. > > > > Other than that, perhaps in ZFS it would be easier to prune the unused > > directory entries, than it is in UFS. It looks like this is not implemented. > > > > Another reason might be some FreeBSD specific implementation issue for > > fstatfs. > > > > In any case, the data available is not sufficient. More information would > > help, like how much RAM this system has, how much ARC uses, some ARC stats. > > Which sysctl's would you like?
Output from "sysctl vfs.zfs kstat.zfs" would be sufficient. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, US | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
