on 15/08/2011 13:34 Steven Hartland said the following: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andriy Gapon" <a...@freebsd.org> >> I think (not 100% sure) that with DDB in kernel we could get a better >> backtrace >> here, possibly with pre-dblfault stack frames, because DDB backend is a bit >> more >> smarter than the trivial stack(9) printer. > > I've added this into the the kernel on my test machine and will try > to get it panic over the next few days. Seems to need a few days on > uptime before the panics start happening. In addition to increasing > KSTACK_PAGES to 12, if you believe this may be stack exhaustion, do > you want me to remove this increase?
Yes, I think it would make sense to change KSTACK_PAGES to the default value. But, OTOH, if you can afford to have DDB in a few more machines, then it would be interesting to compare behavior with different stack sizes. BTW, if you don't want your machines to sit at ddb prompt after panic, then you'd also need either KDB_UNATTENDED option or set debug.debugger_on_panic=0. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
