On 17/08/2011, at 6:57 AM, Yuri wrote: > On 08/16/2011 13:37, Xin LI wrote: >> And I think John's patch is right, I've added a new PCI ID for it >> though, found from the datasheet. Did you have uart(4) in your kernel >> (remove my old patch)? > > Yes, uart(4) is in kernel and puc(4) is the loaded module. I think this might > be a problem that puc(4) is a module loaded later and that's why serial > device isn't registered. I found the reference to the similar situation with > some other card that got cured when puc(4) was compiled into kernel. > (http://www.adras.com/Quadtech-DSC-100-PCI-dual-serial-port-on-8-0R-i386.t6999-79.html) > > I have yet to try building puc(4) into kernel, but the way how I have it now > is the default in GENERIC. Should uart(4) instead be removed from kernel and > made loadable too to prevent such initialization order issue? Or what would > be the right fix? Have too much stuff in kernel isn't right too. uart > probably isn't used by 99% of users.
For my recent Moxa 2 port serial card addition, I had to include puc in the kernel config; it didn't work as a module. Jan. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
