I'll be glad to run buildworld on one of my machines whenever I get connection/internet service again. I'm stating this and emphasizing the previous email because I never had such problems on any of my PPC machines.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Super Bisquit <superbisq...@gmail.com>wrote: > Why not compare native builds to tinderbox? > > 2012/1/4 Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> > >> Garrett Cooper <yaneg...@gmail.com> writes: >> > That's not relevant to these errors. For some odd reason tinderbox >> > takes 1-2 iterations to reach equilibrium when someone makes a data >> > structure change, even a change to a header and C file are done in the >> > same commit. It would be really nice to figure out what the issue is >> > because this is a regular occurrence that pops up on the current@ and >> > architecture specific mailing lists. >> >> All the tinderbox does, really, is "rm -rf /usr/obj; make buildworld". >> >> Note that the tinderbox pulls sources from CVS, so even if both files >> were modified in the same SVN commit, it may still end up with an >> inconsistent tree. >> >> DES >> -- >> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no >> > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
