On 02/03/2012 05:34, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:17:14 pm George Mitchell wrote: >> On 02/02/12 15:37, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: >>> [... one of three errors it's been reporting repeatedly for days ...] >> Talk about a lack of focus! Apparently two or three people have all >> recently checked in code without first verifying that it compiled (let >> alone ran), or else possibly did not completely commit their changes, >> and then absconded to a place where they fail to receive these emails >> about the problems. Can someone please either diagnose these errors or >> else revert the deficient commits? -- George Mitchell > > No, it is more that the tinderbox for 8 wasn't actually checking these > kernels before (they have been broken since 8.1 and 8.2 were released) and > they are on less-used platforms.
Shouldn't whoever asked for that to be enabled take responsibility for cleaning them up then? > I do agree it needs to be cleaned up one way > or another. Given the reticence to commit changes to release branches, They're already broken. It's hard to see how fixing the problems could make things worse. :) Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"