Hi, On 02 June 2012 PM 9:50:22 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > The point he made was actually not a matter of people not reading > > UPDATING but that UPDATING is oftentimes not updated until after > > the disruptive/potentially dangerous change has already hit the > > ports tree. > > > > I'm not sure what the solution is for the end user. > > We have our reference hosts, do daily portupgrades and on those days > where all looks fine, pkg_create the whole collection and pkg_delete/pkg_add > to production hosts. > > Still not perfect, but 'good enough'. > > isn't this what I just suggested to be done by the team? Give the ports tree a new version number and people can fall back to this then.
Isn't this solution too simple to be done? Erich _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
