On 2012-07-18 14:54, Yanhui Shen wrote: > I'm using clang-complete plugin in vim, > it claims with libclang.so instead of bin/clang it works better. > > However libclang.so is not installed by a default "make buildworld && make > installworld", > even with 'WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS="YES"' in src.conf.
This is because it would add quite a lot of build overhead to produce that .so file: all the object files will need to be recompiled yet again for shared library support. That said, we will probably want to provide at least a shared LLVM lib in the future, since it can be re-used by other programs. When that happens, it would not be too much extra work to provide a shared Clang library. > I have to install lang/clang *again* from ports to acquire the > "libclang.so". Most of the time, people will not need this functionality in base, which is why it is in a port. The same applies if you want the latest version, or if you want to build with any specialized options. > So why not provide "libclang.so" in base directly? > I think if it's not a general component, provide a flag something like > "WITH_LIBCLANG=YES" is also fine. It needs to be figured out properly, which costs time and effort. Both of which are currently in short supply, at least for me... :-/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
