On 27.08.2012 10:06, Matt Smith wrote:
I posted on this mailing list two weeks ago and never received any
replies so I decided to raise a PR via the web form. But I think I
submitted it under the wrong category and it's marked as low priority
as well. But I think this is something that is a potential serious
problem if I end up getting a corrupted filesystem so I'm posting
here
again in the hope somebody can help this time. The PR is
amd64/170646.
I'm now running the latest RELENG_9 code as of 25th August as I've
done a new buildworld/kernel. I still get the same problem. When I
reboot it I get WARNING: / was not properly dismounted and it
rebuilds
from journal. On shutdown I get the messages pasted below. I'm
running
amd64 with GPT partitioning, UFS2 with softupdates and softupdates
journalling enabled. I have a custom kernel but I don't think I took
anything important out of it.
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...7 7 2 0 0 done
All buffers synced.
fsync: giving up on dirty
0xfffffe0007102780: tag devfs, type VCHR
usecount 1, writecount 0, refcount 2292 mountedhere
0xfffffe000000729ca00
flags (VI(0x200))
v_object 0xfffffe0005101910 ref 0 pages 23509
lock type devfs: EXCL by thread 0xfffffe00018fe08e0 (pid 1)
dev label/root
umount of / failed (35)
Then when the box comes back up again it detects that / was not
unmounted
cleanly and recovers from journal before marking it clean once more.
My uname:
FreeBSD tao.xtaz.co.uk 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat
Aug 25 12:34:52 BST 2012
r...@tao.xtaz.co.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TAO amd64
My glabel status:
Name Status Components
gpt/gptboot N/A ada0p1
gptid/bfe99d62-e00f-11e1-8623-00012e475ffb N/A ada0p1
label/root N/A ada0p2
label/swap N/A ada0p3
My fstab:
/dev/label/root / ufs rw 1 1
/dev/label/swap none swap sw 0 0
My gpart:
=> 34 1250263661 ada0 GPT (596G)
34 1024 1 freebsd-boot (512k)
1058 990 - free - (495k)
2048 1228931072 2 freebsd-ufs (586G)
1228933120 21330575 3 freebsd-swap (10G)
Hi Matt
I'm far from anything near an expert on file systems but I'd suggest
you remove softupdates and leave journaling on.
tunefs -n disable
There's no need to have both on and although I agree that both SHOULD
work together there's no reason to have them on together. It will only
slow down writes to the file system. Effectively soft updates was a
go-between before journalin was introduced.
//Clay
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"