On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel <jfvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x. > >> > >> You're right, it seems to be pointing to the igb(4) driver in 9.x > >> compared to < 9.0. > >> > > How do you determine that since it doesn't happen without lagg? I've no > > reports of igb hanging otherwise and its being used extensively. > > Well, I did say "seems to". :) > > igb+lagg worked for us on 8.3. Haven't tried it since moving to 9.0 > and 9-STABLE on those three boxes. > > igb+lagg doesn't work for him on 9.0. Although, I don't recall if > non-LACP options were tried earlier in this thread, or if it's just > the LACP mode that's failing. If one mode works (say failover) and > LACP mode doesn't, that "seems to" point to lagg. > > I'll see if I can free up an igb port on my 9.0 and 9-STABLE boxes to > test this with as well. > > I wouldn't use 9.0, go with 9.1 RC or whatever has the latest igb code, if you see the issue there I can see about getting some time to look into it here. Jack _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
