On 29 November 2012 10:16, Willem Jan Withagen <w...@digiware.nl> wrote:
> On 2012-11-29 16:08, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 29/11/2012 10:53 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>>>> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
>>>> Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>> on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
>>>>>> As far I can see it fails because there is no getnewvnode_reserve()
>>>>>> / get_newvnode_drop_reserve() in 9.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch is for stable/9.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, thanks.
>>>>
>>>> I've made a new diff because Willem's patch does not apply
>>>> on 9.STABLE (fails on opensolaris_lookup.c) :
>>>>
>>>> This one is for 9-stable rev 243569:
>>>> http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/9-STABLE-r243569-patch-zfs-reboot
>>>>
>>>> It solves the reboot problem on my server. I'm testing it on my
>>>> workstation with few "poudriere bulk". It looks to work.
>>
>> Thank you very much for testing!
>>
>>> Andriy sent me his diff aginst HEAD, which I reworked against the code I
>>> have here locally. I did an svn diff against the checkout of that
>>> morning. And I'm pretty sure i'm tracking stable/9
>>>
>>> So I'm not sure where I went wrong, but thanx for fixing it.
>>
>> I MFC-ed some ZFS changed from HEAD last weekend.
>
> Would that mean that the regular checkout of stable/9 contains enough
> code to allow "painless" rebooting...
>
> Reason I ask:
>         I'm about to ship the server to the customer
>
> But there is still 45 minutes before UPS comes to pick it up.
> And I'd rather run a regular checkout, instead of the patched one.
>
> Which then gets me to the svn question:
>         How do I easily get ride of the changeds?

If I understand what you want correctly, just run 'svn revert -R .'

-- 
Eitan Adler
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to