> On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein <bri...@mu.org> wrote: >> On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> >>> On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski <tak...@takeda.tk> wrote: >>>> >>>> That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would >>>> decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a huge >>>> change, and would definitely be hard for people to adjust. >>> >>> Just In Case: >>> >>> FreeBSD has no plans to switch to get in either the short or long >>> term. We will however offer git repositories and first-class cousins >>> via git.freebsd.org and github. >>> >>> >> Are you sure? Most of the diffs developers have been handing me lately are >> of the form a/path b/path so I think they are mostly using git behind the >> scenes. > > Yes. I use git behind the scenes as well. However, so far as I am > aware, there are no plans in either the short or long terms to > *convert upstream* to git.
Thank God! I'd hate to think that after unwinding years accumulated CVS process, to rewind it for SVN, only to have to do it again for GIT, just seems a bit masochistic. --Chris > > > -- > Eitan Adler > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"