on 27/01/2013 19:27 Adrian Chadd said the following: > On 26 January 2013 02:15, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> on 23/01/2013 18:20 Adrian Chadd said the following: >>> It may be a quirk of an older 9.x, which is fixed in -HEAD. It may be >>> a quirk of the older generation celeron hardware - in which case, we >>> need to tell the user somehow.. >> >> This is not software related at all. It's the hardware feature (or its >> absence). >> I wonder if your celerons report PBE feature. > > What am I looking for?
PBE in dmesg > And personally, requiring (much) more recent hardware to get > sane/correct (btu inefficient) behaviour out of the timekeeping > framework is a little .. suboptimal. :) Well, I never knew about this issue before but I always assumed that the reasonable behavior was the behavior. And I never encountered any evidence to the contrary. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
