On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Steve Kargl < s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:22:14PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Since FreeBSD 9.0 we are successfully running on the new CAM-based ATA > > stack, using only some controller drivers of old ata(4) by having > > `options ATA_CAM` enabled in all kernels by default. I have a wish to > > drop non-ATA_CAM ata(4) code, unused since that time from the head > > branch to allow further ATA code cleanup. > > > > Does any one here still uses legacy ATA stack (kernel explicitly built > > without `options ATA_CAM`) for some reason, for example as workaround > > for some regression? > > Yes, I use the legacy ATA stack. > > You're missing the reason for why you're running the old ATA stack. Do you have hardware that doesn't work with ATA_CAM? Have you not tried ATA_CAM on that box? Some other reason? -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
