On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Matthias Andree <mand...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Am 27.03.2013 22:22, schrieb Alexander Motin: >> Hi. >> >> Since FreeBSD 9.0 we are successfully running on the new CAM-based ATA >> stack, using only some controller drivers of old ata(4) by having >> `options ATA_CAM` enabled in all kernels by default. I have a wish to >> drop non-ATA_CAM ata(4) code, unused since that time from the head >> branch to allow further ATA code cleanup. >> >> Does any one here still uses legacy ATA stack (kernel explicitly built >> without `options ATA_CAM`) for some reason, for example as workaround >> for some regression? Does anybody have good ideas why we should not drop >> it now? > > Alexander, > > The regression in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/157397 > where the SATA NCQ slots stall for some Samsung drives in the new stack, > and consequently hang the computer for prolonged episodes where it is in > the NCQ error handling, disallows removal of the old driver. (Last > checked with 9.1-RELEASE at current patchlevel.)
We're talking about 10.x, so if you want it fixed, you need update with 10.x information. Please put 10.x diagnostics in the PR. -- Peter Wemm - pe...@wemm.org; pe...@freebsd.org; pe...@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV bitcoin:188ZjyYLFJiEheQZw4UtU27e2FMLmuRBUE _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
