On Apr 23, 2013, at 4:33 AM, Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
>>> >>> If we can't reach an agreement, I'm happy to wrap the relevant bits with >>> an "if (bootverbose)", but I really feel users should have some way to >>> see this information outside of bootverbose. >> Both da and ada drivers already have sysctl's. It should be trivial to add >> one more, especially if just numeric. > > Wouldn't camcontrol be a better place for this? Yes, the forest of CAM sysctl's needs to be trimmed and discouraged from growing. I like Jeremy's original proposal for exposing quirk information, and I think that it would be served well via camcontrol, not the console or sysctl. Scott _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
