On 06/07/2013 06:06 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, June 07, 2013 5:07:34 am Julian Stecklina wrote: >> On 06/06/2013 08:57 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 06, 2013 9:54:35 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >> [...] >>>> The problem seems to be in incorrect interaction between devfs_close_f > and >>>> linux_file_dtor. The latter expects curthread->td_fpop to have a valid > reasonable >>>> value. But the former sets curthread->td_fpop to fp only around > vnops.fo_close() >>>> call and then restores it back to some (what?) previous value before > calling >>>> devfs_fpdrop->devfs_destroy_cdevpriv. In this case the previous value is > NULL. >>> >>> It is normally NULL in this case. Why does linux_file_dtor even look at >>> td_fpop? >>> >>> Ah. I think it should not do that and make the data it uses in the dtor > more >>> self-contained: [...]
Seems to fix my panic. Thanks! Julian _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
