On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Daniel Kalchev <dan...@digsys.bg> wrote:
> > On 30.07.13 15:21, Mark Felder wrote: > >> People don't seem upset about not having a webserver, IMAP/POP daemon, >> or LDAP server in base, so I don't understand what the big deal is about >> removing BIND. >> > > I believe the primary reason these things are not in the base system is > that they have plenty of dependencies, with possibly conflicting licenses > etc. > > If the concern is over the rare case when you absolutely >> need a DNS recursor and there are none you can reach I suppose we should >> just import Unbound. >> > > There are many and good reasons to include an fully featured name server, > or at least full recursive resolver. For example, for properly supporting > DNSSEC. > We could in theory remove the BIND's authoritative name server > executable... if that is attracting the SAs. > > The justification "reduce the number of SA's", that is, "the bad PR" is > probably not enough. Going that direction, we should consider Comrade > Stalin's maxim "FreeBSD exists, there are problems, here is the solution -- > no FreeBSD, no problems!" :-) > > Daniel > Then , there exists a new problem : "There is no FreeBSD ..." Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"