On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:11:09PM -0400, J David wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov > <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch > > is not critical there. > > There is lots of other stuff in r250907 / reverted by r254754. Some > of it looks important for sendfile() performance. If testing this > extensively in the next few days could help get that work back into > 9.2 we are happy to do it, but if it's too late then we can leave it > for those on stable/9.
The revert in the r254754 is only a workaround for your workload, it does not fix the real issue, which can be reproduced by other means. I am not sure would re allow to merge the proper fix, since we are already somewhere in RC3.
pgpLSIemB6rTj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
