I think it works on HEAD. I suspended OK and tried to resume. The resume initiated and my screen came on... only to tell me that da0p2 was not available. I seem to recall that this was a known issue when running on a USB attached disk. The failure came much further along than on stable where it failed immediately with fans turning on, but nothing else happening, and, if I could connect the disk directly, I suspect it would work. Unfortunately, I don't have a spare SATA disk... only old PATA drives and the T520 only takes SATA drives.
Bottom line is that the issue I saw with 10.1-STABLE and 10.1-BETA1 is not present on HEAD, so this is entirely a regression in STABLE. I will be updating to BETA2 shortly and I'll report how it works there. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:07 PM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 03:10:59 PM Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: >> > >> > Please forgive me if this seems impudent, but has there been any >> progress on >> > this? The status of the bug report hasn't changed since it was opened. I >> > don't mean to be rude, and I certainly appreciate the effort that's gone >> > into this already (especially Kevin's detective work), but support for >> > suspend-to-RAM and my laptop's hotkeys were essentially the only reasons >> > I started tracking 10-STABLE to begin with. Since both features were >> > resolved many months ago, I was hoping to switch from -STABLE to >> 10.2-RELEASE >> > when it came out, but I'm starting to get the feeling that won't happen >> > because of a single errant commit. Having to continue following -STABLE >> > would not be terrible, but it would be disappointing. >> >> As noted previously, I have been moving house and generally offline since >> mid-June (and I'm not really fully online yet). My last request was if >> Kevin (or someone else with an affected laptop) could test HEAD to see if >> there is a missing bugfix on HEAD that needs to be merged. This specific >> change was tested on HEAD on both a T440 and X220 and on 10 to test the >> MFC on the T440. >> >> -- >> John Baldwin >> > > John, > > I am back from my vacation and hope to try HEAD soon, hopefully this > weekend. Since HEAD has been a bit fragile of late, I do plan on testing > and switching back to STABLE. I will probably install HEAD on a spare > drive. With luck (meaning nothing crops up that fills the available time), > I should have an answer on Monday. > > Hope the move was not too chaotic and life gets back to normal quickly. (I > hate moving, but I do so twice a year. Practice makes something approaching > perfect.) > -- > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
