On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:35:06PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > > On Aug 17, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:27:41AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > > >> hi, > >> I have a host (Dell R730) with both cards, connected to an HP8200 > >> switch at 10Gb. > >> when writing to the same storage (netapp) this is what I get: > >> ix0: ~130MGB/s > >> mlxen0 ~330MGB/s > >> this is via nfs/tcpv3 > >> > >> I can get similar (bad) performance with the mellanox if I increase the > >> file size > >> to 512MGB. > > > > Look like mellanox have internal beffer for caching and do ACK acclerating. > what ever they are doing, it's impressive :-) > > > > >> so at face value, it seems the mlxen does a better use of resources > >> than the intel. > >> Any ideas how to improve ix/intel's performance? > > > > Are you sure about netapp performance? > > yes, and why should it act differently if the request is coming from the same > host? in any case > the numbers are quiet consistent since I have measured it from several hosts, > and at different times.
In any case, for 10Gb expect about 1200MGB/s. I see lesser speed. What netapp maximum performance? From other hosts, or local, any? _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
