Added hrs@ to CC.
On 1/13/16, Daniel Bilik <d...@neosystem.org> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:04:18 +0100 > Daniel Bilik <d...@neosystem.org> wrote: > >> A week ago I upgraded two systems where stf(4) is used. They were running >> 10-stable from beginning of September, with stf working fine. After >> upgrade, the address on stf0 stays "tentative" indefinitely. > > I've finally got some time to analyze this more thoroughly. And indeed, > the problem was introduced with both r287734 (changes to in6if_do_dad() in > sys/netinet6/in6.c) and r290348 (changes to nd6_timer() in > sys/netinet6/nd6.c), specifically in combination with stf(4) interfaces not > being > marked "running". Attached patch fixes that. Should I create PR for this? > > -- > Dan > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
