Hi, On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 01:41:42 +0200 Fernando Herrero Carrón <elfe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> El 28/8/2016 0:06, "Erich Dollansky" <erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com> > escribió: > > > > Hi, > > > > Micheal did a plain compiler benchmark on FreeBSD 11: > > > > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd11-clang-gcc&num=1 > > > > It shows clearly how slow CLang is compared to GCC. > > > > This is the price FreeBSD has to pay to be free of GPL in the base > > system. > > > > Erich > > Very cool comparison, thanks a lot! > > I think gcc has a lot of knowledge and experience under its belt, a > larger user base so no wonder it performs [slightly] worse. What has > really surprised me has been ImageMagick, apparently because of > openmp. The OpenMP stack has been contributed by intel, clang 3.4 if > I recall it right. Surprising. > this time, Micheal did a good job. GCC is just too old to be bad. The situation was the same for GCC when it was compared to commercial compilers those days. GCC was a lot slower. Erich _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
