On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 08:14:07PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 19:29, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > This is possible, of course. But it would not affect "SMP: Added CPU ..."
> > lines.
>
> Well, looking at the code it seems that only if mptable is used, then those
> lines are expected to correctly identify a BSP. With MADT there is no
> information to identify the BSP and that is supposed to happen in
> cpu_mp_start().
>
>
> static void
> madt_add_cpu(u_int acpi_id, u_int apic_id, u_int flags)
> {
> struct lapic_info *la;
>
> /*
> * The MADT does not include a BSP flag, so we have to let the
> * MP code figure out which CPU is the BSP on its own.
> */
> ...
>
> In other words, those "SMP: Added CPU ..." are truly a cosmetic issue.
> And it's my guess (just a guess) that BSP LAPIC ID is incorrect in the
> problematic configuration.
For next day or two I am have new server with same hardware before put
in prodution.
Can I do some test for you?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
