Jakub Lach <jakub_l...@mailplus.pl> writes: > On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores > comparing to > 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about > 40%). > > I have never seen something like that, and I'm running Unixbench on -STABLE > since > 2008.
Agree; clang/llvm and friends have added a lot of value. It's worth it I think. It is however getting harder to continue with a source based update model, which I prefer even though most people just use package managers today. I still like to read the commits and understand what's changing, why, and select the version I am comfortable with given the nuances of my configuration(s). I think that's why 'knock-on-wood' I've been able to track mostly CURRENT and/or STABLE without any outages since about 1998 on production systems :-) _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
