On 15 Apr 2020, at 0:37, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is
set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-04-12
===================================
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for
the period
from 2020-04-06 to 2020-04-12.
During this period, we have:
* 1801 builds (94.0% (+0.4) passed, 6.0% (-0.4) failed) of buildworld
and
buildkernel (GENERIC and LINT) were executed on aarch64, amd64,
armv6,
armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, powerpcspe, riscv64,
sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches.
* 288 test runs (25.1% (-24.6) passed, 29.9% (+10.6) unstable, 45.1%
(+14.1)
exception) were executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for
head,
stable/12, stable/11 branches.
* 30 doc and www builds (83.3% (-1.3) passed, 16.7% (+1.3) failed)
Test case status (on 2020-04-12 23:59):
| Branch/Architecture | Total | Pass | Fail | Skipped |
| ------------------- | --------- | ---------- | -------- | -------- |
| head/amd64 | 7744 (+4) | 7638 (+19) | 14 (+5) | 92 (-20) |
| head/i386 | 7742 (+4) | 7628 (+15) | 16 (+5) | 98 (-16) |
| 12-STABLE/amd64 | 7508 (0) | 7449 (-3) | 1 (+1) | 58 (+2) |
| 12-STABLE/i386 | 7506 (0) | 7425 (-17) | 2 (+2) | 79 (+15) |
| 11-STABLE/amd64 | 6882 (0) | 6829 (-6) | 1 (+1) | 52 (+5) |
| 11-STABLE/i386 | 6880 (0) | 6749 (-82) | 80 (+80) | 51 (+2) |
(The statistics from experimental jobs are omitted)
If any of the issues found by CI are in your area of interest or
expertise
please investigate the PRs listed below.
The latest web version of this report is available at
https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/report-20200412 and archive is available
at
https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/ , any help is welcome.
## News
* The test env now loads the required module for firewall tests.
* New armv7 job is added (to replace armv6 one):
* FreeBSD-head-armv7-testvm
The images are available at https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org
FreeBSD-head-armv7-test is ready but needs test env update.
## Failing jobs
* https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc6_build/
* See console log for the error details.
## Failing tests
* https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test/
* local.kyua.integration.cmd_about_test.topic__authors__installed
* sys.netipsec.tunnel.empty.v4
* sys.netipsec.tunnel.empty.v6
* sys.netpfil.common.forward.ipf_v4
* sys.netpfil.common.forward.ipfw_v4
* sys.netpfil.common.forward.pf_v4
* sys.netpfil.common.tos.ipfw_tos
* sys.netpfil.common.tos.pf_tos
* sys.netpfil.pf.forward.v4
I can’t actually reproduce this failure in my test VM, but with the ci
test VM I can reproduce the problem.
It’s not related to pf, because the sanity check ping we do before we
set up pf already fails.
Or rather pft_ping.py sends an incorrect packet, because `ping` does get
the packet to go where it’s supposed to go.
Scapy seems to fail to find the source IP address, so we get this:
12:12:22.152652 IP 0.0.0.0 > 198.51.100.3: ICMP echo request, id 0, seq
0, length 12
I have a vague recollection that we’ve seem this problem before, but I
can’t remember what we did about it.
In all likelihood most of the other netpfil tests fail for exactly the
same reason.
Best regards,
Kristof
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
