> On 18 Aug 2020, at 11:29, O'Connor, Daniel <dar...@dons.net.au> wrote:
> I think it would make sense to patch the port to add another stanza which 
> matches EFISYS as well as EFI.
> 
> What do you think?

I was going to file a bug but bugzilla is having a nap right now.

This patch works for me:
[midget 12:47] /tmp/hal >cat 
files/patch-fdi_policy_10osvendor_20-storage-methods.fdi
--- fdi/policy/10osvendor/20-storage-methods.fdi.orig   2020-08-18 
12:41:54.869810000 +0930
+++ fdi/policy/10osvendor/20-storage-methods.fdi        2020-08-18 
12:42:14.480922000 +0930
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@
        <match key="volume.label" string="EFI">
          <merge key="volume.ignore" type="bool">true</merge>
        </match>
+       <match key="volume.label" string="EFISYS">
+         <merge key="volume.ignore" type="bool">true</merge>
+       </match>
       </match>

       <match key="volume.fstype" string_outof="ntfs;vfat">

--
Daniel O'Connor
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
 -- Andrew Tanenbaum


_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to