Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 03:32:49PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 08:27:50AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > No longer correct. You don't need to futz with libraries and symlinks
> > > any more,
> >
> > Shouldn't we remove "NODESCRYPTLINKS" from /etc/defaults/make.conf and
> > anywhere else it is still used?
>
> I think so. There's no operational downside to having a library which
> can do DES and MD5 passwords any more, since it won't stubbornly
> default to DES.
Ok, maybe I'm the one who is missing something, but what if I *want* a
crypt() that stubbornly defaults to DES? The current situation gives me
that opportunity. If you remove NODESCRYPTLINKS please provide a
suitable substitute, then leave it alone. This is something that's
changed several times in -Stable as well as -Current, and it's getting
to be a pita.
Doug
--
So what I want to know is, where does the RED brick road go?
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
