>
> On 17-Nov-00 Blaz Zupan wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > Ok, then it is the same as leaving the "irq" part out alltogether.
> >>
> >> Not entirely. IRQ 0 is actually the clock. I think it is there to allow
> >> you
> >> to edit the IRQ during the kernel config to set it to IRQ 10 if you need t
> o.
> >
> > Ok, so could this be the problem? I've been removing the "irq" part on the
> > pccard line on all our boxes (and we have about 100 installations) and neve
> r
> > had a problem with it. I've never tried setting it to "irq 0".
>
> Removing it should be fine. I think it is more of a hack to allow an irq
> setting to be there for the kernel config to pick up on and let the user edit
> .
> :)
Which is all great and good except that it is not mentioned
in UPDATING and the release notes lie (irq 0 != poll mode).
So something needs to be fixed, whether it be GENERIC, the
release notes or UPDATING.
Mark
>
> --
>
> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
> PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
