Re: row locking, transactions and "toy", please see this page.
http://netgraft.com/~mbac/research/mysqlmyths.html
-----------------------------------------------------
Ken Menzel ICQ# 9325188
www.icarz.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dag-Erling Smorgrav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew Sherrod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jeff Eckermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Oracle,
> Andrew Sherrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just to correct the statement about MySQL not being of
> > production grade... My current employer uses both
> > Oracle and MySQL on our backend. Yes, MySQL lacks some
> > of the features (transaction logging, transaction
> > control, row level locking, 4th gen. language
> > interface, adequate documentation of C interface, etc)
> > but in cases where those features are not needed it is
> > robust enough, and fast enough, to compete quite well
> > with the bigger and more feature-filled databases.
>
> No. You can't build a prober relational database without reference
> integrity and transaction integrity. MySQL has neither. Take my
word
> for it as someone who has extensive experience developing
applications
> on top of MySQL: it's not much more than a toy.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
