On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:56:55AM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote:
> "Alexey V. Neyman" wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Not only that, even 3.5.1-RELEASE fails to compile world for RELENG_4.
> > What about staying insecure for a few hours of make world on 4.2-RELEASE,
> > if this worries you, you may turn on firewall, either enabling only
> > trusted addresses or disabling all services in question, which were found
> > to be insecure in 4.2-RELEASE (ftpd, ntpd...).
>
> That is not what I want to hear <g>. That my planned update route
> won't fly, I mean. As to the insecurity risks... nah, I won't loose
> any sleep over the slight and temporal insecurity. The worse that
> could happen is, well, what? Nothing springs to mind. We're not an
> interesting target to crackers.
>
> Anyway, the box is currently happily runing 3.5.1-STABLE. But you are
> saying that I should not go straight to the RELENG_4 tag. So what tag
> do you suggest? I've only done CVSups within the stable branches. and
> port and security ones naturally. So I don't know any other tags <g>.
>
> Couldn't find that page that listed the tags in the emanual either.
> I did look! Really.
You should probably go to 4.1-Release or 4.2-Release first. Several
reports indicate that they should work.
The tags for those releases ar RELENG_4_1_0_RELEASE and
RELENG_4_2_0_RELEASE respectively.
--
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
