If memory serves me right, Chris Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 04:50:28PM -0300, Vitor de Matos Carvalho wrote: > > Because when it left the 4.1.1-release version turned STABLE? > > I may be wrong, but I believe that was before the invention of the security > branches. 4.1.1-RELEASE was a snapshot of RELENG_4--I don't think there was a > RELENG_4_1--but 4.6.2-RELEASE isn't. 4.6.2-RELEASE is a snapshot of the > security branch, RELENG_4_6.
This is correct. 4.1.1-RELEASE was a "look, ma, we can get rid of RSAREF" snapshot of RELENG_4. There wasn't much QA done on that release, that's why we erred on the side of caution in trying to put out 4.6.2-RELEASE. Bruce.
msg48838/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
