On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:13:06PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:52:36PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > > > Sergey Osokin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Is there any way to make it work? > > > > > > To fool firewall? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, looks like a bad/fool/stupid firewall administriva. > > > > > > > > I know, there are lots of companies that permit any inside > > > > initiated TCP connection. I'd call this stupid if not > > > > explicitly decided upon and documented. > > > Yes. I agree, maybe this is a good policy. And moreover > > > I think that they closed port 5999 on firewall because > > > of my activities :-) Perhaps they thought that I'm trying > > > do something, which will break their security. Maybe because > > > port number is not very popular :-) > > > > > > > And last - maybe they are running a strict application level > > > > gateway like Gauntlet or Sidewinder? If this is the case the > > > > admin must define a custom TCP proxy for CVSup, first. > > > No. Fortunatly. > > > > Last idea is use CTM. AFAIK your system administrator think > > that 25 port is much more popular for you and other users :-) > > It seems to me that yes. But can I get whole repository with CTM, > as I did with cvsup?
Just look at ctm(1) and http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ctm.html -- Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEWS / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
