Oliver Fromme: >Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:42:57PM +0200, Jaco van Tonder wrote: > > > I just cvsup'ed to that latest -STABLE and saw that option HTT > > > is no longer availible in LINT. Does anyone know why this is no > > > longer supported? I searched the stable@ list but cant seem to > > > find anything on this. > > It is no longer necessicary as HTT logical CPUs are now > > activated by default. If you wish to use them, set the sysctl > > machdep.hlt_logical_cpus to 0. >Can that sysctl be changed at runtime, or is it only possible to do it >in the loader? The UPDATING entry isn't completely clear about that.
I can confirm from experience that changing this sysctl to 0 immediately started the second logical CPU. Turning it back to 1 apparently stops processes on the second logical CPU to start, instead everything runs on CPU0. However processes running on the second CPU remain there until they terminate. >By the way, are there any "real world" experiences whether it's worth >it to use the logical CPUs, say, on a PostgreSQL or Apache server, or >with Java stuff (jakarta/tomcat etc.)? That would interest me as well. In particular I would be interested where improvements might be expected - in CPU-intensive environments, interrupt-intensive enviroments, and I/O-intensive environments. I am running a system that walks a couple of thousand files every minute - would that benefit from HTT? (I seem to recall that UFS as part of the kernel is restricted to a single CPU?) Helge _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
