El Lunes, 6 de Diciembre de 2004 08:39, Rob escribi�: > Hi, > > For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: > > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable > standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current > > I find this naming rather confusing. Why "stable" refers to STABLE, > but "standard" refers to CURRENT ? > > This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not the following name > convention: > > release-supfile : for FreeBSD-RELEASE
Better security-supfile. There is just one release, things like RELENG_5_3 are security branchs, not release branchs. > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-STABLE > current-supfile : for FreeBSD-CURRENT > -- josemi _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
