-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:25:24 +1030, "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't need to update a port just because it depends on Xorg. The X > API is quite stable so you can update just Xorg without expecting any > problems. (I did XFree86 -> Xorg with zero problems for example) No, the problem's the other way round. Every time I want to portupgrade something else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg. I don't want the latest Xorg after the horror stories I heard. That's why I'm building firefox-1.0.1 independently of the ports system, so that I don't have to go through the pain of upgrading Xorg (on which firefox depends, naturally) as well. Now, if I could be certain that Xorg has settled down, I wouldn't mind upgrading from 6.7.0 to 6.8.1 and have done with it. - -- G. Stewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The average nutritional value of promises is roughly zero. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCIGX1K5oiGLo9AcYRAnxVAKCMuYMlZxaqjrqCUI1eKxJC/9QN5gCgqpKD sOKB6hFwBJ1BdY42Zi3ItuA= =6QjU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
