On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 05:39:40PM -0400, Gary Mulder wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Pawel Malachowski wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > > > > Correct. IPF is unstable with our SMP (most of the time) - based 5.x > > > boxes. VERY unstable. VERY VERY unstable. > > > > Hm, this sounds bad. What is debug.mpsafenet set to? How big is traffic? > > > > I have one SMP box with ipnat, routing some megabits (even during night > > it's more than 30-40Mbps) without problems, however, ipnat is used only > > for very small group of hosts right now. > > But we plan to use ipnat more heavily so it sounds a bit scary. ;) > > >From personal experience I can repeat what Matt has stated. It seems to be > related to what NIC you have. I have had crashes with fxp (Intel Pro > 100MBit) and bge (Broadcom Gigabit) NICs under moderate network load. > Removing ipf reduced but did not eliminate the crashes. debug.mpsafe also > reduced but did not eliminate the crashes.
No, that's different then. Please report your bugs in the usual way (gdb traceback, etc). Kris
pgp7c9XhqJG0U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
