On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > > Still, isn't it strange that the kerberos libs don't have any > > > > dependencies registered? A quick check shows that they are almost the > > > > only libs in /usr/lib that have zero output from ldd. > > > > > > Probably they are statically linked. > > > > No, static libraries don't come with an .so extension. :-) > > No, you missed my point. I mean that kerberos libs are dynamic but > linked against other libraries statically.
If they were, there would be no problem in the first place. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgp7dhgifPldu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
