On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Sure, but I think it's the *syntax* that matters here? options -> nooptions / i486_cpu -> no??? It's OK to leave GENERIC alone, but HOW are things switched off?
It appears to be an ommission in the file format. I've e-mailed Ruslan, who implemented nodevice and nooption, to suggest that he also add nocpu. I wonder if there are other missed syntactic bits of note.
Robert N M Watson _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
