On 11/3/05, Taras Savchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My SATA HDD with UFS2 crashed. While checking HDD fsck said, that alternate > super block at block 32 is not present. In 'man fsck' I saw, that in UFS2 > (my file system) alternate super block is usually located in block 160 (For > UFS1 - in 32). So the question is: why fsck trying to find alternate > superblock in wrong block for UFS2? I can suppose, that fsck dont know file > system type (UFS1 or UFS2) while checking, but such assumption seems to be > wrong. > > fsck with '-b 160' optione works well.
I think this is a bug. You may want to dig into fsck_ffs/setup.c to find out how to solve this...
_______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
